There will be major changes to measures aimed at unemployed people on benefit if the Danish government follows the recently published recommendations from the so-called Carsten Koch committee. A new employment policy is expected to be ready before the summer recess.
Cuts to the job centres’ much criticised activation offers for the unemployed and more focus on unemployment funds. These are among recommendations from a committee led by former Minister for Taxation Carsten Koch. The government has asked it to prepare the ground for a reform of the employment system for unemployed people who have signed up to an unemployment fund.
After one year in the making, the much anticipated recommendations are now ready and have been sent to the social partners for consultation, before being presented to the government in February 2014. The content will not be made public until then, but leaks suggest an employment policy with a range of new elements to it.
One of the committee’s more controversial proposals is that unemployed people with a good chance of finding new work quickly should be allowed to choose whether they want to deal with their job centre or the unemployment fund during the first six months of unemployment.
With that Carsten Koch is interfering in a dispute between municipal job centres and unemployment funds which has been running for years; whose responsibility is it to work with the unemployed?
Today’s rules say unemployed people on benefits must attend meetings and hold conversations both with their municipality’s job centre and with their unemployment fund manager. The unemployment funds feel this is unnecessary, and they have long been pushing to take over the entire responsibility for people during their first six months of unemployment.
Carsten Koch does not want to go that far, and the municipal job centres and the employers in The Confederation of Danish Employers (DA) are also very much against the idea of strengthening the role of the unemployment funds. They do not believe the funds to be better positioned than the job centres to find jobs.
If the politicians choose to follow Carsten Koch’s recommendations it will also mean an end to forcing unemployed people to take part in guidance and retraining. Instead they will be offered the chance to agree on measures directly with their job centre. This recommendation comes after massive criticism from job centres which have argued that forcing the unemployed to attend special courses and retraining programmes has been both a waste of money and of the time of the unemployed.
The Carsten Koch committee does, however, stress that the unemployed will continue to be available to the labour market and that they will still have to be available for work in order to be able to collect unemployment benefits.
The committee also wants to give job centres a far more pro-active role in their cooperation with businesses, and they should systematically offer help in terms of recruitment, guidance, retraining and the retaining of workers when they for instance need long term sickness leave.
Another noteworthy proposal from the committee is to give unemployed people over 30 the chance to take vocational education in return for a cut in their unemployment benefit. This means the unemployed will pay parts of the bill themselves in order to return to the labour market. The committee does not say how much the benefits would be cut, but people should be offered a loan which would take them up to a regular benefit level.
Koch also suggests the system should be better at targeting the unemployed who really need help. Not all unemployed people should be offered six weeks education of their own choosing, which is the case today, the committee says. Unemployed people who can easily find work should loose their right to such training.
The committee also recommends speeding up the activation for unemployed people over 30. Today this doesn’t kick in until after nine months of unemployment. The committee wants to see activation happening after six months, for instance in the form of internships.
The committee has also looked into which activation measures actually work. And they all do — except state wage subsidies. The committee found no positive activation effect stemming from that. Wage subsidies could play a positive role as a social measure, however.
The government acknowledged the need for an employment policy reform last year, in the wake of severe criticism of municipal job centres’ attempts at getting unemployed people back into work. The Minister of Employment, Mette Frederiksen (Social Democrats) agreed there was a need to reboot the measures aimed at the unemployed, which cost Denmark 6bn Danish kroner (€804m) every year.
“For too long the measures have been running around in circles in darkness. This has led to controls and meaningless activation rather than real retraining and lasting employment. It is our duty to think again,” said Mette Frederiksen as she commissioned the Carsten Koch committee to do their work.
The government will not comment on the Carsten Koch committee’s recommendations until they are made public later in February. After that the government will draft its own suggestion for reform. The aim is to secure a broad parliamentary majority backing and support from the social partners, and to pass the reform in parliament before the summer recess.
from the Carsten Koch committee’s recommendations for strengthened unemployment measures aimed at people on unemployment benefit:
Guidance and retraining should only be an offer, not a duty.
Unemployed people with good chances of finding work should be allowed to choose whether they want a job seekers’ allowance from their unemployment fund or from the job centre during the first six months of unemployment.
The right and obligation to seek activation offers for unemployed people over 30 should be sped up to kick in after only six months rather than nine. Unemployed people under 30 should have the right and obligation to seek activation offers as early as three months into their unemployment.
Unemployed people under 30 should be linked to the job centres’ job search processes.
During their final six months of drawing unemployment benefits, all unemployed people should have the right to access a personal career advisor.
The unemployment funds should retain the main responsibility for assessing people’s availability to the labour market, but job centres should be given better insight into the funds’ decisions and be given a right to complain.
The right to six weeks education of the unemployed person’s choosing should be scrapped.
Unqualified people over 30 should be given the right to attend vocational training in return for a reduction in their benefits from day one of their unemployment. A loan should be offered to allow people to draw the full benefits during their education, before repaying it when the education ends.
Job centres and unemployment funds should no longer be obliged to have regular conversations with the unemployed.
Repeated activation should no longer be mandatory.
All job centres should have a strategy for creating and maintaining contacts with businesses.
Source: altinget.dk (in Danish)